Difference between revisions of "32/25"
(→Cost) |
|||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
== Why/how this will be good to have == | == Why/how this will be good to have == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Many members feel that keeping the metal space running is: | ||
| + | - important as it is the primary interest of many members | ||
| + | - easier than arranging for secure storage and its costs, and the eventual logistical issues of finding a new space with less inertia/interest | ||
| + | - feasible, now that we have more ownership of the space and can address safety concerns (access, equipment inductions- basically, a clean start) | ||
| + | |||
| + | How does the hackspace benefit: | ||
| + | Generally, the feeling is that while not all members use all tools actively, having access to as broad of a set of tools and workspaces possible is many members' reason for joining- see recently those such as Dan and Ned. Members in favor agree that this represents a good short-term, and good enough medium/long term option while we await the main hackspace move, with the goal to be to find a place that can accomodate both the hackspace and metalspace equipment. The short notice to vacate is especially beneficial. | ||
== Who is supporting the project == | == Who is supporting the project == | ||
Revision as of 20:36, 24 August 2026
Contents
Title
St. Savior's Yard Metalspace
Proposer
Paula Gardner, Ellis Waller
Date proposed
24/08/26
Date for Decision
27/08/2026
Cost
250 a month w/ 2 months' notice to quit, potential moving van cost (~70 quid for a day)
What is being asked for
Why/how this will be good to have
Many members feel that keeping the metal space running is:
- important as it is the primary interest of many members - easier than arranging for secure storage and its costs, and the eventual logistical issues of finding a new space with less inertia/interest - feasible, now that we have more ownership of the space and can address safety concerns (access, equipment inductions- basically, a clean start)
How does the hackspace benefit: Generally, the feeling is that while not all members use all tools actively, having access to as broad of a set of tools and workspaces possible is many members' reason for joining- see recently those such as Dan and Ned. Members in favor agree that this represents a good short-term, and good enough medium/long term option while we await the main hackspace move, with the goal to be to find a place that can accomodate both the hackspace and metalspace equipment. The short notice to vacate is especially beneficial.
Who is supporting the project
Comments
Outcome
go to proposals
