Difference between revisions of "28/25"
Alanscrase (talk | contribs) |
Alanscrase (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
== Outcome == | == Outcome == | ||
| − | + | Support was strong for Bambu P1S and only one dissenr who suggested other makers. One condieration was a bigger build volume. | |
| + | The leads of the 3d room (and others) liked the idea having two of the same which made inductions, people learning othwe software and processes. | ||
| + | Therefore it was decided to approve the proposal as is. | ||
go to [[Proposals_and_decision_making_-_open |proposals]]<br> | go to [[Proposals_and_decision_making_-_open |proposals]]<br> | ||
Latest revision as of 10:14, 26 March 2025
Second Bambu Lab P1S - No AMS
Contents
Title
Second Bambu Lab P1S - No AMS
Date proposed
15/03/2025
Date for Decision
29/03/2025
Cost
£509/£639 without "offer" + Running costs
What is being asked for
A second Bambu P1S to alleviate any traffic and bottlenecking in members being able to print at the same time as another member or to print multiple parts at the same time.
Why/how this will be good to have
This will alleviate any traffic and bottlenecking in members being able to print at the same time as another member or to print multiple parts at the same time, this also allows for a printer to be left with a different nozzle for either stronger or more detailed prints
Who is supporting the project
Cristian Ladak, Tim Parnell, Liam Egan, Alan Scrase, Dean, Issy, Uggy, Paula Gardner, Tom Goff, Stef C, Nicholas W
Comments
With insurance compaines not liking unattended use of 3d printer, a second bambu would ease the pressure of attended printing.
Outcome
Support was strong for Bambu P1S and only one dissenr who suggested other makers. One condieration was a bigger build volume. The leads of the 3d room (and others) liked the idea having two of the same which made inductions, people learning othwe software and processes. Therefore it was decided to approve the proposal as is.
go to proposals
